Tag Archive for 'mindset'

Page 2 of 3

Barcelona: postion, intensity and speed

Xavi returned to Barcelona with several technical and tactical obsessions, two of them above all: finding the free man and minimizing lost balls. Recovering the positional play and the level of intensity needed to get the ball back in the shortest possible time, Xavi crushed Carlo Ancelotti’s Real who, if it hadn’t been for Thibaut Courtois’ saves, would have gone to sleep with an even heavier result on their conscience: “Why did I ask the boys to run even when we were four goals up? Because if it’s true that we were winning 4-0 today, it’s also true that when we’re up by just one goal, in order not to lose, we’ll have to keep running and pressing, helping the full-backs… Losing a ball must make us furious, it bothers me a lot when it happens. And if we are not demanding the results will not come.”

As I was explaining to the psychologists of the Master of Sport Psychology, a match is played on some technical-tactical factors but at the same time they have a strong psychological meaning: position, intensity and speed.

This is what Xavi coached and asked Barcelona to do. How many Italian teams play with this kind of will?

10 rules of growth mindset

The wrong mindset to the game in soccer

In our soccer league, it is clear that a problem that affects the game of the teams and, therefore, the result is the inability to maintain a standard of continuity of play. Even this week, we heard Inzaghi, Inter’s coach, say that the team had entered the field to play the match against Torino with the wrong mentality. It means starting a match with superficiality in the hope that sooner or later a goal would have decided the game in their favor.

Wrong mentality means conducting a warm-up just to avoid getting hurt, having the mind occupied by other thoughts that do not concern the game or absenting themselves from what happens on the field.

When this lazy approach affects a team it is very difficult to change it during the course of the game: at the beginning it dominates the presumption that the result will change in their favor, as if it were obvious, while at the end a state of apathy can take over with a game almost stopped or paroxysmal agonism, dominated by a sterile agonism.
This is a problem that Juventus had in the first few games of the season, in a more evident way, and that was so serious as to compromise the entire championship. The other teams pretending to the title have manifested it more in this second phase of the season with a series of useless draws with lower level teams.

It is these lost points that will decide the championship, without prejudice to the possibility of collapses or resounding comebacks and that will always give us a demonstration of the team mentality.

The mindset of “All is well”

There are athletes who have no difficulty understanding that mental training is a daily commitment. They often say, “All is well.”

When I was young, Everything is fine was the phrase I used to write to my mother when I sent her postcards in the summer, it was a way to reassure her. Of course she thought I didn’t really want to say how I was doing and she was right.

How did the training go: “All right.” Do we learn anything from this sentence about how that session went? Yes, that the athlete is not aware of what they did or more trivially that they don’t want to talk about it.

When the response refers to psychological aspects of training it is meant to mean: “I did what the coach told me and I committed to doing my best.” This seemingly positive response excludes any information regarding how I did the exercises, how I dealt with mistakes, how I corrected myself, and so on. In other words, the athlete’s response is global but does not provide specific information about the performance of the training. We don’t know, for example, if there were drops in concentration or if the activity was carried out with the necessary level of intensity.

We learn, first of all ourselves, not to use these two terms “All right” and teach athletes to be specific and not to take refuge in this reassuring approach.

Be focused on the performance and not the outcome

I often wonder if it isn’t repetitive to keep talking about thinking about the performance rather than thinking about the result.

Nevertheless, I still find myself talking about this topic with the young people I work with, for the reason that they bring it up. Some says: “I always think about the result of the match, since the day before so I get tense and nervous and this doesn’t help me” or even “I think about the most important match even if it is in a month and not about the ones that come before”. A tennis player: “Before I was always thinking about the point, now I think more about pushing”.

Let’s just say that most athletes are not trained to think about performance, which concerns the behaviors to put in place to achieve the result goals (win, do your personal best, get into the final) but they think more easily of the result of their actions, I won/lost.

Many young people still think that the result should be their main thought.

Athletes must be aware that the mistake is always technical, if a shot in soccer goes out instead of into the goal it means that the ball has been hit badly, but this is only the effect, the question that the athlete and the coach must answer is:

  • the mistake is technical because the young has tried a shot that he/she does not yet fully possess due to some technical limitation.
  • the mistake is mental because he/she had to pass the ball, since from that position he/she would never have hit the goal.

The same mistake can be caused by different factors, if the coach continually puts the emphasis only on technique or tactics, the athlete will develop a mentality in which every mistake is always technical and therefore he/she never think to train the mindset.

Today constraints could open our mind?

Read this information trying to think if the constraints we live today can help us open our mind and channel our creativity.

Ravi Mehta, Meng Zhu, Creating When You Have Less: The Impact of Resource Scarcity on Product Use Creativity, Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 2016, 767–782.

As we become a more abundant society, do our average creativity levels decrease?

Findings from recent research support this proposition. In accordance with our line of reasoning, the analysis of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking performance data over the past five decades indicates that in spite of the rise in IQ scores, creative thinking scores have significantly decreased since 1990, especially for kindergarteners through third grade students (Kim 2011).

Various lines of research suggest a possible negative correlation between resource availability and creativity and Historians have suggested a negative relationship between overconsumption and innovation.

The literature on:

  • Materialism shows that high levels of material values are negatively associated with individuals’ intellectual and spiritual development
  • Consumption and society argues that creativity is incompatible with the repetitiveness of modern mass production, which is shifting the culture from one that was intellectually challenging into one that is harried, familiar, and entertaining.
  • Paradoxes of technology suggests that while innovation and technology provide various benefits such as freedom, control, and efficiency, they could also usurp human motivation and skills, leading to dependence, ineptitude, and disengagement

Mindset and focus

We need to integrate these two aspects.

 

 

 

The team rigid mindset is the reason for the defeats

The most serious problem for a team and athletes is to think they are good.

This belief immediately puts people in a condition of greater satisfaction and fuels the expectation that everything will go well as they expect, so we will win.

Feeling fit and being aware of your personal and team skills is certainly important. Often teams think that this condition is enough to achieve success. They don’t understand that it is necessary but not enough.

To play at a high level, you have to have the skills of a high level team. Then you have to prove it on the pitch.

Arrigo Sacchi says that the motivation must be exceptional, because on this basis the player is constantly striving to improve himself. That’s what Carol Dweck has called a growth-mindset. Those who don’t demonstrate it are destined to have what the coaches say: a mental block. In other words, these players have a rigid mentality that leads them to think that their talent and fitness are enough to be effective in their work.

Serious mistake. They will strategie the match without the motivation to play at the best. They will enter with the conviction that they will play well so spontaneously, and when faced with the difficulties of the match they will not be ready to adapt, because they hadn’t foreseen it.

Covid and mindset: a lost war

Now begins the phase of self-control. There was a case of covid in an international golf tournament, the same happened in Adria in the tournament promoted by Djokovic, where a finalist was positive. In Italy, in football there will be a bland quarantine in case the virus hit a player or other members of the team. Small but negative signals that push us to live in apnea, as if waiting.

Always negative and more relevant signals come from Italy. There are statistics that say that the number of positives is not falling as expected, probably due to inadequate behaviors. And this would increase the probability of a second wave in the autumn. According to research conducted by the Catholic University, 41% of Italians do not seem willing to vaccinate against Covid. At the moment only a few million people have downloaded the Immuni App. It is mainly people between 35 and 59 years (with 48%) to declare that they do not want to be vaccinated, it is also a transversal group in relation to professions that unites workers and entrepreneurs, employees and professionals. They share a psychological profile in which prevails a “fatalist”, “individualist and selfish” and do not perceive the value of social responsibility. The research has shown that compared to March, the self-control of the population to respect the rules has decreased, dysfunctional behaviors have increased and the emotional willingness to continue to respect them has decreased.

Therefore, these people show a difficulty in integrating the return to normality within the framework of rules that are not the usual ones, but which imply awareness of the social role of each person with regard to the management of their own health and responsibility towards their community. These dysfunctional attitudes are the usual ones that people use to justify to themselves behaviors that are clearly negative for their health, just think of the problems related to smoking, nutrition and sedentary lifestyle, just to remember the most common ones in our society. The fatalistic approach (“I will certainly not die of cancer because I smoke” or “You have to die of something anyway”) and the individualistic approach (“They say what they want me to smoke” or “Life is mine and I do what I want”) are enemies of social life and personal self-control. We are faced, therefore, with the reactions that people show to those problems requiring solutions that are developed in the long term and do not end quickly. They are not reactions different from those they have used in the past, but until now they have mainly involved only themselves.

To this approach should be added that crowding into a square to have fun with friends immediately produces positive emotions, while respecting the rules of physical distancing to stay healthy will only produce a positive effect over time. In essence, these behaviours are reinforced by the immediate benefits that they bring and that outweigh the costs and consequences over time.

We need a change of mentality because now it is completely different and the effects of our actions have an effect on the health of others we come into contact with.The difference lies in the pandemic that involves the whole of society, which has hit everyone’s daily life very hard and still continues to change the rules of social coexistence and work. All this requires a collective solution that drastically reduces dysfunctional behaviors and the whole country will have to actively move in this direction.

Mindset